34 members
39 members
28 members
In response to the HEFCE Open Access Policy for REF2020, the Publishers Association has made the following …Continue
Tags: Publishers, Association, REF2020, HEFCE, ROARMAP
Started Oct 13, 2014
Exchange in SIGMETRICS with David Wojick, a consultant to…Continue
Tags: OA, PolicyÈ, "US, fastr, osti
Started Oct 25, 2013
I very much hope that my own will not be the only voice in favour of Fred Friend's Sense over Finch/Willetts Folly at the…Continue
Tags: OA Mandates, UK, finch, rcuk
Started Oct 25, 2013
Bob Campbell wrote on the Wiley blog:"…Continue
Tags: fool's gold, hybrid gold
Started Oct 25, 2013
Added October 23, 2010 at 12:38am 1 Comment
Added by Stevan Harnad
Added by Stevan Harnad
The EC-commisioned Science-Metrix study has a lot of interesting and useful information that I hope the EC will apply and use.
Access Timing. The fundamental problem highlighted by the Science-Metrix findings is timing: Over 50% of all articles published since 2007 are freely available…
ContinuePosted on October 23, 2014 at 2:30am
Posted on October 13, 2014 at 11:41pm
For those Elsevier authors who wish to provide OA rather than continuing to agonize over what Elsevier might intend or mean:
Believe Elsevier when they state officially that "Elsevier believes that individual authors should be able to distribute their AAMs for their personal voluntary needs and interests, e.g. posting to their…
ContinuePosted on October 25, 2013 at 12:30am
Welcome to
Open Access Week
in partnership with our
Advisory Committee
1 member
35 members
48 members
All content subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License unless specified differently by poster. Created by Nick Shockey. Powered by
Comment Wall (4 comments)
You need to be a member of Open Access Week to add comments!
A stevan, one of my friend told me to add you here ,you could help me, hope you will accept me
options binaires
Stevan Harnad
As Science is mere structured common sense,
her means but trial-and-error made intense,
the only virtue setting her apart,
and raising her above (some think) mere Art,
is her convergence ever on consensus:
collective, self-corrective her defenses.
A flagellant, she boldly does defy
Reality her schemes to falsify.
And yet this noble jousting were in vain,
and all this pain would yield no grain of gain
if Science were content, a shrinking violet,
her works from all the world e'er to keep private.
Instead, performance public and artistic,
restraining all propensities autistic,
perhaps less out of error-making dread,
than banal need to earn her daily bread.
For showbiz being what it is today,
work’s not enough, you’ve got to make it pay.
What ratings, sweeps and polls count for our actors,
no less than our elected benefactors,
for Science the commensurate equation
is not just publication but citation.
The more your work is accessed, read and used,
the higher then is reckoned its just dues.
Sounds crass, but there may be some consolation,
where there’s still some residual motivation
to make a difference, not just make a fee:
the World Wide Web at last can make Science free.
Stevan Harnad
some years ago, three or four, I found a poem Publish or Perish
It gaves me so much... to learn.. and I have to say It also made my day I forwarded, spread that poem to all people I know: librarians and scientist. two years ago during a Conference about biomedical literature and web 2.0 , one of our doctors used that "Publish or Perish" sentence as a as a clausing words.
So, just tell me did I met the author of the poem??
I found fantastic your sdlideshow in cartoon. I reposted it to my blog, of course with small text about OAWeek site and OA family and about your slideshow.
Did you mind? If yes, I will delete that post.
See http://ncrcbiblioteka.blogspot.com
You can read my blog ...with some translator..there is one on footbar...
Cheers