The open access publishing model is great, but as always, there are people who take a good idea and try to ruin it. In this case the people are what I term "predatory open-access scholarly publishers." They exploit the gold open-access model for their own profit, essentially operating as scholarly vanity presses.
Please let me know what you think about this topic, and more importantly, please let me know if you discover any questionable publishers (or individual journals) that are not included on the list. Thanks, Jeffrey Beall