BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:NingEventWidget-v1 VERSION:2.0 METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific/Midway X-LIC-LOCATION:Pacific/Midway BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:-1100 TZOFFSETTO:-1100 TZNAME:SST DTSTART:19700101T000000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:5385115:Event:103560 DTSTAMP:20260413T032919Z SUMMARY:THOUGHT EXPERIMENT #2: Student Recognition in a Timely Manner DESCRIPTION:Two scenarios in which a compromise must be found that pro tects the research agenda for future publications but also provides so me measure of recognition that student expertise and creativity were d emonstrated. What would you do as the research leader (Faculty)?\nScen ario 2:  A student is applying for a job with the government that inv olves GIS (geospatial mapping) work, and would like to include in the ISU ReD institutional repository an electronic copy of their recent po ster which highlights their contributions to their reseach group work over the recent two years. The final work has been submitted, but has not yet been accepted for publication in a leading peer reviewed journ al. The Faculty members involved would like to wait for final acceptan ce of the paper before promoting their work, as they fear some of the key findings and novel techniques might be used by others before they receive credit or have a chance to utilize this information in other w ays. The poster presentation was safe, as it had a limited local audie nce - but placing this material in ISU ReD would mean it would be disc overable by people immediately across the entire research community.   How can you balance the wishes of the student for timely recognition with the concerns of pre-publication release of novel information? \n  \nEven though most universities and funding agencies want their resul ts published as widely as possible, these two scenarios demonstrate th at there are legitimate reasons to consider an embargo on certain mate rials ... for protection of ideas, credit, confidentiality, or even fu nding requirements. Whenever student work is involved, it is desirable to have clear guidelines and understandings in place about such pre-p ublication releases before research is begun. The ability for institut ional repositories and e-print servers to provide immediate and world- wide distribution of ideas may influence policies and procedures in un intended ways. Funding agencies and research organizations need to dev elop standards for such expectations, but still recognize that unique concerns and circumstances may need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Students should be aware of their roles and responsibilities t hroughout the entire scholarly information lifecycle.\n\n\nFor more in formation visit http://legacy.openaccessweek.org/events/thought-experi ment-2-student-recognition-in-a-timely-manner DTSTART;TZID=Pacific/Midway:20131025T150000 DTEND;TZID=Pacific/Midway:20131025T160000 CATEGORIES:discussion, in, library, "mock trial", on, friday LOCATION:Milner Library 213c WEBSITE: URL: CONTACT: ORGANIZER;CN="David Stern":http://legacy.openaccessweek.org/profile/Da vidStern ATTACH;FMTTYPE="image/jpeg": ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE;CN="David St ern":http://legacy.openaccessweek.org/profile/DavidStern END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR